A Google Webmaster Help
has Google's head of search spam, Matt Cutts, giving advice to a
webmaster. The advice, don't copy content from Wikipedia and expect to
rank well.
The truth is, Wikipedia is a great source for facts.
Webmasters simply should not copy and paste it verbatim. You can use it
when writing stories and for fact checking, but not for copy and paste.
Matt Cutts wrote:
I picked a page at random:
http://www.listofwonders.com/top-10-famous-haunted-places-in-the-world
and the first sentence of the first haunted place is "Berry Pomeroy
Castle, a Tudor mansion within the walls of an earlier castle, is near
the village of Berry Pomeroy, in England."
If you look up the
Wikipedia page of Berry Pomeroy Castle, the first sentence of the
Wikipedia page is "Berry Pomeroy Castle, a Tudor mansion within the
walls of an earlier castle, is near the village of Berry Pomeroy, in
South Devon, England."
That was the very first random thing I
checked, and it doesn't bode well for your site. If you're just copying
text and pictures from other sites, I'd expect that your site would only
be adding a limited amount of value for visitors, so it's not a huge
surprise that your site doesn't get a ton of traffic at this point. I'd
take some time to think about ways to add more value for someone who
lands on your site.
It is tempting to just
copy and paste and try to pass it off as your own. But use it as
research, not as a content source. Write your story or summary around
your research and don't just copy and paste.
No comments:
Post a Comment